The NHL playoffs will forever be the best month and a half of television that you can find. No matter who is in the tournament, the yearly battle for the Stanley Cup is some of the most dramatic and captivating television you can find.
Even with all of the shenanigans, this year has yet to disappoint. The nightly gongshow that has become the 2012 Stanley Cup Playoffs has become appointment television that even the most casual of hockey fans have found interest with. The ratings from the Pittsburgh/Philadelphia ratings do all the talking.

However, things are starting to spiral out of control. From the lack of respect from the players, the lack of control from the officials to the lack of consistency from the league, some major problems have come to a head through just half of round one. Yet, I do have to ask, is this all bad for the game?
Obviously the ridiculous hits and headhunting are an ugly addition to these playoffs and need to be stopped. However, the fights and line brawls have to bring some extra spice for those casual viewers who may not be true hockey fans. Think about it, casual sports fans think hockey is all about fighting; these playoffs have provided plenty of that. There has even been some decent numbers in the goal scoring department, another category that is referenced when bemoaning television viewership.
While the offense hasn’t surpassed the magical six goals per game mark – 5.28 goals per game entering Wednesday – nearly every game has been a blast to watch. Personally, five goals in a game is really all you need. A 3-2 game is typically thrilling and features nearly two goals per period, you can’t ask for too much more. Also consider that there have been eight overtime games played of the 25 so far in these playoffs. Those OT games are basically canned drama that any fan could find interesting. Even the scoring numbers have been slightly skewed. Considering there have been three 1-0 games and two additional three-goal contests, the scoring could be much higher. Continue reading






– Number three goes to this year’s classic. The prominent use of the Liberty Bell looks great but the Bridgestone logo doesn’t look right at the bottom of the bell. What’s worse is that placement clearly bumped “Philadephia 2012” to the outside. Had the Bridgestone logo or the location found a different home, the logo would likely be a bit more aesthetically pleasing.
2- Pittsburgh’s 2011 Winter Classic logo comes in at number two. The use of the iconic yellow bridge and the way in which the shape of the bridge flows with the entire logo is fantastic. The I-beam is a nice understated addition too. Unlike the 2012 logo, the location and date being bumped to the outside isn’t nearly as obtrusive. A big win for the 2011 designer.
1- Wrigley Field has taken quite a few number one’s from me regarding my Winter Classic rankings. A great game, perfect weather, legendary venue and awesome uniforms. Add to that a clean, classic logo. First, there is no appearance of the sponsor on this logo, which is a big plus. Also, the subtle icicles and the excellent interpretation of the Wrigley marquee makes this an all-around winner.
